Although for the majority the auxiliary languages are all the same, I think that we can’t put all of them at the same level of scientific construction and «philosophical» conception.

So, I think that is a good practice to study the bases and concepts of each language and do not include in the discourse sentences like «number of adherents…» bla, bla…

I read carefully your works on NPIE/Europaio and would like to say that although the project is a valuable task, however the aim to implement an auxiliary language based on such a strange, distant, and hypothetical language as is the PIE, is a (broad) vision not sustainable (for the moment it is only for some «elected», not for the crowd…). Maybe, we must go on step by step learning some synthetic and valuable projects that can, one day, lead us to the ante-Babel times… Nowadays it seems that the way lead us into another direction of the same labyrinth…

Regards,
carlos soreto
[ex LVSITANIA]