<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Argumentation, debate, and dialectic in Science, applied to Linguistics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://carlosquiles.com/indo-european-language-blog/2007/08/argumentation-debate-and-dialectic-in-science-applied-to-linguistics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://carlosquiles.com/indo-european-language-blog/2007/08/argumentation-debate-and-dialectic-in-science-applied-to-linguistics/</link>
	<description>Proto-Indo-European Language, Indo-European Languages &#38; European Union Language Policy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 01:59:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Indo-European languages of Europe &#187; Blog Archive &#187; A simple FAQ about the &#8220;advantages&#8221; of Esperanto and other conlangs: &#8220;easy&#8221;, &#8220;neutral&#8221; and &#8220;number of speakers&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://carlosquiles.com/indo-european-language-blog/2007/08/argumentation-debate-and-dialectic-in-science-applied-to-linguistics/comment-page-1/#comment-236</link>
		<dc:creator>Indo-European languages of Europe &#187; Blog Archive &#187; A simple FAQ about the &#8220;advantages&#8221; of Esperanto and other conlangs: &#8220;easy&#8221;, &#8220;neutral&#8221; and &#8220;number of speakers&#8221;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 14:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carlosquiles.com/indo-european-language-blog/2007/08/21/argumentation-debate-and-dialectic-in-science-applied-to-linguistics/#comment-236</guid>
		<description>[...] place revisionism or alternative medicines as equally valid theories or sciences: there are academic and scientific criteria that help classify knowledge into scientific and pseudoscientific. Most (if not all) Esperantist claims are at best pseudoscientific, and when they claim real [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] place revisionism or alternative medicines as equally valid theories or sciences: there are academic and scientific criteria that help classify knowledge into scientific and pseudoscientific. Most (if not all) Esperantist claims are at best pseudoscientific, and when they claim real [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
