Indo-European languages of Europe

Proto-Indo-European Language, Indo-European Languages & European Union Language Policy

Grammar

Is euroscepticism gaining momentum in Ireland, as it supposedly did in France and the Netherlands?

June 14, 2008 by Indo-European

Less than half of the Irish population voted on the Lisbon Treaty, the so-called Constitution of the European Union. In other words: 862,415 votes against and 752,451 in favour, giving a majority of 109,964 against, decided this time the future of nearly 500 million Europeans. Some pro-Europeans are asking now what eurosceptics have often asked before: “Is this what we call democracy?” The ‘No’ has eventually prevailed, while the Lisbon Treaty had been already ratified in 18 EU member states; those ratifications will possibly serve for nothing, more or less like the previous ratifications of the European Constitution after voters in France and the Netherlands rejected it in similar referenda.

The most common sentences heard in EU member states among supporters of the No are “the EU isn’t a democracy“, because “they didn’t inform us about this or that”, or “they are doing things without us“. Even if such slogans are obviously false and demagogic, they are equally repeated by all parties looking for the No; actual reasons behind No-ist groups are, however, quite different, and can usually be summed up into:

  • Radical leftists, always asking for a “less capitalist” and “more social” Europe; something like a renewed Warsaw pact?
  • Ultraconservatives, who won’t accept anything against their national supremacy concept, be it for racial, cultural, linguistic or historical reasons.
  • AND, no matter what ideas behind them, opposition parties just wanting to take the lead of their country or region, using referenda as another way to show popular support, no matter if it affects the rest of us Europeans. If the Government says YES, they’ll look for some reason to say NO.

Of course, they all “win” when the No wins, and ‘the others’, be it ‘capitalism’, or ‘progress’, or the party looking for the Yes, “loose”. Apparently, apart from British and American eurosceptic media and lobbies, European neonazis and communists are also cellebrating the one-million No throughout Europe, even after complaining so much about the “false democracy” the EU represents, what gives a general idea of who actually “loses” in the European Union with this vote, and who actually cared for democracy in Europe and who didn’t…

If Europe had one common language - and I don’t mean a lingua franca like English, or any Esperanto out there - political discussion and regulation debates at European level could be followed by all; if Europe worked as one democracy, were the majority (not individual countries) decided about the future of us all; and if Europe was something less a customs union, and more of a real country, maybe people would bother to go and vote for their future, instead of resting at home letting the different euroscepticisms - or, better, euroegoisms - of their country’s minorities rule.

By the way, I’m not currently for the Yes of a Constitutional treaty that brings us more of the current distribution of the EU budget pie, among the (unofficious) predominant English use in official communications, the (not-so-official) English+German+French rules regarding common translations, and the 25 official languages into which every important communication should be made available; and the thousands of millions of euros spent yearly to support the so-called “multilingualism” policy in the EU in any possible way, with different programmes and investments, whithout directly admitting those costs as part of their language policy. But, that 862,415 Irish supporting Sinn Féin’s or UK businessman (founder and funder of Libertas anti-European lobby campaigns) Declan Ganley’s views decide that the rest of us 490 million Europeans should pay for yet another project of the EU Constitution until it is eventually approved, that’s certainly not the idea I have on how to improve things in the EU…

Posted in European Union, Politics |

2 Responses

  1. libertas Says:

    If the NO wins in a democratic referendum, there’s no democracy in the EU; European democracy is then not to ask people. Overwhelming logic of pro-European neoliberal colonialism…

  2. Indo-European Says:

    @libertas:
    1) “European democracy is not to ask people”. I didn’t say that. I said that all democratically elected Governments of the EU member states and the Europarliament have participated in the elaboration and approval of the European Constitution, and that to date 19 member states have ratified it, with other countries (like Spain) ready to continue ratifying it even without Irish support. Ireland makes up 1% of the EU population, and less than half of its voters have voted on this referendum, and - under the pressure of fierce campaigns of radical leftists and ultraconservative/christian/eurosceptic lobbies - less than 0.2% of Europeans - in this case unhappy Irish voters - are likely to decide (again) the future of the European Union, for other 3-5 years maybe, making us all spend millions in a new Constitutional project. European democracy means today unfortunately that everyone must agree on every step - what makes pro-Europeanism almost impossible, and euroscepticism too easy. The current European ‘democracy’ makes too easy for you eurosceptics to hinder any advance, and a regime where minorities rule cannot be called democracy.
    2) “pro-European neoliberal colonialism”. I’m just wondering…You are from the UK (at least your IP), and obviously eurosceptic; and from your comment, “anti-neoliberal” too? Wow, you must be double-eurosceptic then… or maybe you are just a conservative guy trying to disguise your euroscepticism under the ideas of others? You don’t want to fit into the typical conservative-anti-European-pro-American suite? You could have chosen “Sinn Féin” as your nickname, but that was possibly too much for your non-nationalist disguise…?
    I might be wrong, but the “neoliberal colonialism” the Lisbon treaty and the European Constitution brings is probably in any case less “neoliberal” and less “colonialist” than what the most leftist anti-European British politician in the UK Parliament asks for today…

Leave a Comment