<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Indo-European languages &#38; Europe &#187; International Auxiliary Languages</title>
	<atom:link href="http://carlosquiles.com/indo-european-language-blog/category/ial/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://carlosquiles.com/indo-european-language-blog</link>
	<description>Proto-Indo-European Language, Indo-European Languages &#38; European Union Language Policy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 May 2011 15:48:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
<cloud domain='carlosquiles.com' port='80' path='/indo-european-language-blog/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />
		<item>
		<title>About the European Union&#8217;s arcane language:  the EU does seem difficult for people to understand</title>
		<link>http://carlosquiles.com/indo-european-language-blog/2009/02/about-the-european-unions-arcane-language-the-eu-does-seem-difficult-for-people-to-understand/</link>
		<comments>http://carlosquiles.com/indo-european-language-blog/2009/02/about-the-european-unions-arcane-language-the-eu-does-seem-difficult-for-people-to-understand/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 13:12:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Indo-European</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[English]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indo-European]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Auxiliary Languages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Language alternatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Proto-Indo-European]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bbc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[common language]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eu language]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eu languages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eu parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[europarliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[european]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[european languages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[languages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mardell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mark mardell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mep]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[modern indo-european]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carlosquiles.com/indo-european-language-blog/?p=419</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mark Mardell asks in his post Learn EU-speak: Does the EU shroud itself in obscure language on purpose or does any work of detail produce its own arcane language? Of course it is not just the lingo: the EU does seem difficult for people to understand. What&#8217;s at the heart of the problem? His answer [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://carlosquiles.com/indo-european-language-blog/2009/02/about-the-european-unions-arcane-language-the-eu-does-seem-difficult-for-people-to-understand/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A simple FAQ about the &#8220;advantages&#8221; of Esperanto and other conlang religions: &#8220;easy&#8221;, &#8220;neutral&#8221; and &#8220;number of speakers&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://carlosquiles.com/indo-european-language-blog/2008/11/a-simple-faq-about-the-advantages-of-esperanto-and-other-conlangs-easy-neutral-and-number-of-speakers/</link>
		<comments>http://carlosquiles.com/indo-european-language-blog/2008/11/a-simple-faq-about-the-advantages-of-esperanto-and-other-conlangs-easy-neutral-and-number-of-speakers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 12:43:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Indo-European</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conlang]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[English]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Esperanto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ido]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indo-European language]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interlingua]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Auxiliary Languages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Language alternatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linguistics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Proto-Indo-European]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[creationism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[easy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[esperanto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[faq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ido]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indo-European]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interlingua]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[language]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lojban]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[neutral]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[number of speakers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[popularity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regional language]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[speaker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[volapük]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wikimedia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wikipedia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carlosquiles.com/indo-european-language-blog/?p=66</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is, as requested by a reader of the Association&#8217;s website, a concise FAQ about Esperanto&#8217;s supposed advantages: Note: Information and questions are being added to the FAQ thanks to the comments made by visitors. 1. Esperanto has an existing community of speakers, it is used in daily life, it has native speakers&#8230; Sorry, I [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://carlosquiles.com/indo-european-language-blog/2008/11/a-simple-faq-about-the-advantages-of-esperanto-and-other-conlangs-easy-neutral-and-number-of-speakers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>32</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How &#8216;difficult&#8217; (using Esperantist terms) is an inflected language like Proto-Indo-European for Europeans?</title>
		<link>http://carlosquiles.com/indo-european-language-blog/2008/06/how-difficult-using-esperantist-terms-is-an-inflected-language-like-proto-indo-european-for-europeans/</link>
		<comments>http://carlosquiles.com/indo-european-language-blog/2008/06/how-difficult-using-esperantist-terms-is-an-inflected-language-like-proto-indo-european-for-europeans/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 09:50:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Indo-European</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conlang]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dnghu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[English]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Esperanto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europaio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indo-European languages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Auxiliary Languages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Language alternatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Proto-Indo-European]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arcaicam esperantom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[declension]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[difficulty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[english]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[esperantism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[esperantist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[esperanto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[european languages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[french]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[german]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indo-European]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inflection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nominal inflection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nordic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[noun declension]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[noun inflection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[polish]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[russian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spanish]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[syntax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[verb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[verbal inflection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[verbal system]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carlosquiles.com/indo-european-language-blog/?p=58</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For native speakers of most modern Romance languages (apart from some reminiscence of the neuter case), Nordic (Germanic) languages, English, Dutch, or Bulgarian, it is usually considered &#8220;difficult&#8221; to learn an inflected language like Latin, German or Russian: cases are a priori felt as too strange, too &#8220;archaic&#8221;, too &#8216;foreign&#8217; to the own system of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://carlosquiles.com/indo-european-language-blog/2008/06/how-difficult-using-esperantist-terms-is-an-inflected-language-like-proto-indo-european-for-europeans/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rhetoric of debates, discussions and arguments: Useful destructive criticism for scientific &amp; academic research, reasons and personal opinions; the example of Proto-Indo-European language revival</title>
		<link>http://carlosquiles.com/indo-european-language-blog/2008/06/rhetoric-of-debates-discussions-and-arguments-useful-destructive-criticism-for-scientific-academic-research-reasons-and-personal-opinions-applied-to-indo-european-language-revival/</link>
		<comments>http://carlosquiles.com/indo-european-language-blog/2008/06/rhetoric-of-debates-discussions-and-arguments-useful-destructive-criticism-for-scientific-academic-research-reasons-and-personal-opinions-applied-to-indo-european-language-revival/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 06:25:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Indo-European</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conlang]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dnghu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Esperanto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europaio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indo-European]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indo-European language]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Auxiliary Languages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Language alternatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Proto-Indo-European]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[academic research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[argument]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[basque]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chomsky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cicero]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cornish]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[creationism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[discussion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[esperanto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[estonian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[finnish]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gimbutas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hebrew]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hungarian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[israeli]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[katharevousa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kkk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[language]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[language revival]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[latin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lojban]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maltese]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[migrations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[minority language]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nazi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[non-indo-european]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[orator]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[personal opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[proto-celtic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[proto-germanic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[proto-language]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[proto-slavic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[racism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ratio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reasons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regional language]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[renfrew]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rhetoric]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scientific research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[skinner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sophism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ukrainian]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carlosquiles.com/indo-european-language-blog/?p=52</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rhetoric (Wikipedia) is the art of harnessing reason, emotions and authority, through language, with a view to persuade an audience and, by persuading, to convince this audience to act, to pass judgement or to identify with given values. The word derives from PIE root wer-, &#8216;speak&#8217;, as in MIE zero-grade wrdhom, &#8216;word&#8217;, or full-grade werdhom, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://carlosquiles.com/indo-european-language-blog/2008/06/rhetoric-of-debates-discussions-and-arguments-useful-destructive-criticism-for-scientific-academic-research-reasons-and-personal-opinions-applied-to-indo-european-language-revival/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wikipedia articles: accuracy, vandalism, spam and administrators</title>
		<link>http://carlosquiles.com/indo-european-language-blog/2007/08/wikipedia-articles-accuracy-vandalism-spam-and-administrators/</link>
		<comments>http://carlosquiles.com/indo-european-language-blog/2007/08/wikipedia-articles-accuracy-vandalism-spam-and-administrators/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Aug 2007 09:31:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Indo-European</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conlang]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dnghu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europaio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indo-European language]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Auxiliary Languages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Proto-Indo-European]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carlosquiles.com/indo-european-language-blog/2007/08/19/wikipedia-articles-accuracy-vandalism-spam-and-administrators/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have discovered (among tons of anti-spam spam) a mail from a Wikipedian asking for collaboration on the discussion about some controversy regarding an article on Dnghu&#8217;s project, about Indo-European language revival &#8211; as far as I&#8217;ve read, it seems to deal with the question &#8220;is Modern Indo-European as Modern Hebrew?&#8221; &#8211; Even if I [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://carlosquiles.com/indo-european-language-blog/2007/08/wikipedia-articles-accuracy-vandalism-spam-and-administrators/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Indo-European language or Indo-European languages?</title>
		<link>http://carlosquiles.com/indo-european-language-blog/2007/06/indo-european-language-or-indo-european-languages/</link>
		<comments>http://carlosquiles.com/indo-european-language-blog/2007/06/indo-european-language-or-indo-european-languages/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2007 08:41:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Indo-European</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conlang]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dnghu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[English]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Esperanto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europaio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ido]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indo-European]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indo-European language]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interlingua]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Auxiliary Languages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Language alternatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Proto-Indo-European]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carlosquiles.com/indo-european-language-blog/2007/06/08/indo-european-language-or-indo-european-languages/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve recently received an email from a new reader who wanted to share with us &#8220;his language&#8221;, namely a &#8216;modernized Indo-European&#8217;, which he had been working on for very very long before we began our public work at the Indo-European Revival Association, and which he deems &#8220;a more modern version of our Indo-European&#8220;. After telling [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://carlosquiles.com/indo-european-language-blog/2007/06/indo-european-language-or-indo-european-languages/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The &#8216;Grin Report&#8217; and its pretended support of Esperanto over Indo-European as European Union&#8217;s official language</title>
		<link>http://carlosquiles.com/indo-european-language-blog/2007/02/the-grin-report-and-its-pretended-support-of-esperanto-over-indo-european-as-european-unions-official-language/</link>
		<comments>http://carlosquiles.com/indo-european-language-blog/2007/02/the-grin-report-and-its-pretended-support-of-esperanto-over-indo-european-as-european-unions-official-language/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2007 12:44:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Indo-European</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conlang]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dnghu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[English]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Esperanto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europaio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ido]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indo-European]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indo-European language]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interlingua]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Auxiliary Languages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Language alternatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Proto-Indo-European]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carlosquiles.com/indo-european-language-blog/2007/02/15/the-grin-report-and-its-pretended-support-of-esperanto-over-indo-european-as-european-unions-official-language/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We have received at Indo-European Language Revival Association an email suggesting us learning more about Esperanto, describing its advantages, and especially talking about the Grin Report, an expert study supposedly favoring Esperanto as the only language for the European Union. This mail comes probably from a reader of Spanish newspapers who read about recent news [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://carlosquiles.com/indo-european-language-blog/2007/02/the-grin-report-and-its-pretended-support-of-esperanto-over-indo-european-as-european-unions-official-language/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Esperanto vs. Europaio?</title>
		<link>http://carlosquiles.com/indo-european-language-blog/2006/12/esperanto-vs-europaio/</link>
		<comments>http://carlosquiles.com/indo-european-language-blog/2006/12/esperanto-vs-europaio/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2006 18:19:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Indo-European</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conlang]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Esperanto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europaio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ido]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indo-European]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indo-European language]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interlingua]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Auxiliary Languages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Language alternatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Proto-Indo-European]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sindhueuropaiom]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carlosquiles.com/blog/?p=10</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve recently read in some forums about Indo-European revival being a &#8220;new IAL&#8221; with &#8216;no chances against Esperanto&#8216;. The objective of Europaio is &#8211; and was &#8211; never to substitute Esperanto or to undermine the Esperanto, Ido, Interlingua, etc. communities. We are very respectful of the long tradition of IALs in building worldwide communities around [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://carlosquiles.com/indo-european-language-blog/2006/12/esperanto-vs-europaio/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Esperanto, Ido, Interlingua,&#8230; (2)</title>
		<link>http://carlosquiles.com/indo-european-language-blog/2006/11/esperanto-ido-interlingua-2/</link>
		<comments>http://carlosquiles.com/indo-european-language-blog/2006/11/esperanto-ido-interlingua-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Nov 2006 19:07:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Indo-European</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conlang]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dnghu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Esperanto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europaio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ido]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indo-European language]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interlingua]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Auxiliary Languages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Language alternatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Proto-Indo-European]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carlosquiles.com/blog/?p=9</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was wondering what could happen if people disagreed with our approaches to Europaio. We have allowed anyone not only to disagree within our frameworks, but also to use our works and names to create their own projects &#8211; but for &#8220;Dnghu&#8221; and &#8220;Europaio&#8221;, if they completely disagree with our grammar rules. We thought this [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://carlosquiles.com/indo-european-language-blog/2006/11/esperanto-ido-interlingua-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

