<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Indo-European languages &#38; Europe &#187; Indo-European language</title>
	<atom:link href="http://carlosquiles.com/indo-european-language-blog/category/indo-european-language/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://carlosquiles.com/indo-european-language-blog</link>
	<description>Proto-Indo-European Language, Indo-European Languages &#38; European Union Language Policy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 May 2011 15:48:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
<cloud domain='carlosquiles.com' port='80' path='/indo-european-language-blog/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />
		<item>
		<title>A Grammar of Modern Indo-European, Second Edition, published online, and its printed version available at Amazon</title>
		<link>http://carlosquiles.com/indo-european-language-blog/2009/10/a-grammar-of-modern-indo-european-second-edition-published-online-and-its-printed-version-available-at-amazon/</link>
		<comments>http://carlosquiles.com/indo-european-language-blog/2009/10/a-grammar-of-modern-indo-european-second-edition-published-online-and-its-printed-version-available-at-amazon/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 12:23:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Indo-European</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Indo-European language]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Proto-Indo-European]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carlosquiles.com/indo-european-language-blog/?p=634</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The latest version of A Grammar of Modern Indo-European, version 4, Second Printed Edition, was published online some days ago. It includes a lot of minor corrections, new examples and sections, and hundreds of pages of Indo-European words and their etymology. It is &#8211; as always &#8211; licensed under a dual CC-by-sa and GNU FDL. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://carlosquiles.com/indo-european-language-blog/2009/10/a-grammar-of-modern-indo-european-second-edition-published-online-and-its-printed-version-available-at-amazon/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Königsberg (AKA Kaliningrad) under international law: Russian, German, Polish, Lithuanian, or simply Prussian?</title>
		<link>http://carlosquiles.com/indo-european-language-blog/2009/02/konigsberg-aka-kaliningrad-under-international-law-russian-german-polish-lithuanian-or-simply-prussian/</link>
		<comments>http://carlosquiles.com/indo-european-language-blog/2009/02/konigsberg-aka-kaliningrad-under-international-law-russian-german-polish-lithuanian-or-simply-prussian/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 21:07:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Indo-European</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indo-European language]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linguistics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[germany]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kaliningrad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kaliningrad oblast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[koenigsberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lithuania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[missile shield]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[modern prussian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[old prussian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[poland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prussia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prussian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prussian language]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[russia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[second world war]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stalin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[star wars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[world war]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[world war II]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wwII]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carlosquiles.com/indo-european-language-blog/?p=465</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The progress of the &#8216;star wars&#8217; (AKA missile shield) affair, which Russia seemed willing to aggravate by talking about plans to station missiles in Kaliningrad, without any concerns whatsoever for the welfare of Kaliningraders and Europeans, should make the European Union reexamine its current policy under the Kaliningrad Strategy, of collaborating with Russia by facilitating [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://carlosquiles.com/indo-european-language-blog/2009/02/konigsberg-aka-kaliningrad-under-international-law-russian-german-polish-lithuanian-or-simply-prussian/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>From Adamic or the language of the Garden of Eden until the Tower of Babel: the confusion of tongues and the earliest dialects attested</title>
		<link>http://carlosquiles.com/indo-european-language-blog/2009/02/adamic-or-the-language-of-eden-before-the-tower-of-babel-dialects-after-the-confusion-of-tongues/</link>
		<comments>http://carlosquiles.com/indo-european-language-blog/2009/02/adamic-or-the-language-of-eden-before-the-tower-of-babel-dialects-after-the-confusion-of-tongues/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 19:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Indo-European</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Esperanto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indo-European language]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Language alternatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linguistics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[babel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bible]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biblical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[catholic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[christian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chronology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[confusion of tongues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[creation science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[creationism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[darwin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dawkins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eve]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[garden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[genealogy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[genesis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[god]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indo-European]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[japheth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jew]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jewish]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kepler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[muslim]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[noah]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[old earth creationism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[semitic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shem]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[timeline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tower of babel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ussher]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carlosquiles.com/indo-european-language-blog/?p=347</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No, I didn&#8217;t have a revelation today. I am just offering a little support exactly to what Dawkins and his Brights dislike, to show them extreme action causes extreme (re)actions. I&#8217;d like to play their radical game, too, offering some help in linguistics to those who have only naïve theories on the language of Eden. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://carlosquiles.com/indo-european-language-blog/2009/02/adamic-or-the-language-of-eden-before-the-tower-of-babel-dialects-after-the-confusion-of-tongues/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Paleoglot by Glen Gordon, about his Proto-Indo-European and &#8220;Proto-Aegean&#8221; (or &#8220;Proto-Tyrrhenian&#8221;) linguistic concepts: The conspiracy of &#8220;dogmatic relativism&#8221; in Language Hat too</title>
		<link>http://carlosquiles.com/indo-european-language-blog/2009/01/glen-gordons-paleoglot-blog-about-his-proto-indo-european-and-proto-aegean-or-proto-tyrrhenian-concepts-dogmatism-and-the-conspiracy-of-dogmatic-relativism-in-language-hat-against-hi/</link>
		<comments>http://carlosquiles.com/indo-european-language-blog/2009/01/glen-gordons-paleoglot-blog-about-his-proto-indo-european-and-proto-aegean-or-proto-tyrrhenian-concepts-dogmatism-and-the-conspiracy-of-dogmatic-relativism-in-language-hat-against-hi/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 12:45:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Indo-European</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Indo-European language]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linguistics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Proto-Indo-European]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dogmatic relativism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dogmatism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[etruscan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[etruscan dictionary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flame]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[glen gordon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[language hat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paleoglot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phoenix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[proto-aegean]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[proto-tyrrhenian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[relativism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[starostin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[troll]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carlosquiles.com/indo-european-language-blog/?p=255</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is well known that Google is used by many when they are too lazy to type in &#8220;.com&#8221;. That&#8217;s the only reason I made a search this morning for &#8220;dnghu&#8221;, because I am usually more interested in knowing if Google searches with keywords like &#8220;Indo-European&#8220;, &#8220;Indogermanisch&#8221;, etc. or &#8220;European language&#8221;, &#8220;languages European Union&#8221;, etc. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://carlosquiles.com/indo-european-language-blog/2009/01/glen-gordons-paleoglot-blog-about-his-proto-indo-european-and-proto-aegean-or-proto-tyrrhenian-concepts-dogmatism-and-the-conspiracy-of-dogmatic-relativism-in-language-hat-against-hi/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A simple FAQ about the &#8220;advantages&#8221; of Esperanto and other conlang religions: &#8220;easy&#8221;, &#8220;neutral&#8221; and &#8220;number of speakers&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://carlosquiles.com/indo-european-language-blog/2008/11/a-simple-faq-about-the-advantages-of-esperanto-and-other-conlangs-easy-neutral-and-number-of-speakers/</link>
		<comments>http://carlosquiles.com/indo-european-language-blog/2008/11/a-simple-faq-about-the-advantages-of-esperanto-and-other-conlangs-easy-neutral-and-number-of-speakers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 12:43:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Indo-European</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conlang]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[English]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Esperanto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ido]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indo-European language]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interlingua]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Auxiliary Languages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Language alternatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linguistics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Proto-Indo-European]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[creationism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[easy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[esperanto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[faq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ido]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indo-European]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interlingua]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[language]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lojban]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[neutral]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[number of speakers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[popularity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regional language]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[speaker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[volapük]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wikimedia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wikipedia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carlosquiles.com/indo-european-language-blog/?p=66</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is, as requested by a reader of the Association&#8217;s website, a concise FAQ about Esperanto&#8217;s supposed advantages: Note: Information and questions are being added to the FAQ thanks to the comments made by visitors. 1. Esperanto has an existing community of speakers, it is used in daily life, it has native speakers&#8230; Sorry, I [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://carlosquiles.com/indo-european-language-blog/2008/11/a-simple-faq-about-the-advantages-of-esperanto-and-other-conlangs-easy-neutral-and-number-of-speakers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>32</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rhetoric of debates, discussions and arguments: Useful destructive criticism for scientific &amp; academic research, reasons and personal opinions; the example of Proto-Indo-European language revival</title>
		<link>http://carlosquiles.com/indo-european-language-blog/2008/06/rhetoric-of-debates-discussions-and-arguments-useful-destructive-criticism-for-scientific-academic-research-reasons-and-personal-opinions-applied-to-indo-european-language-revival/</link>
		<comments>http://carlosquiles.com/indo-european-language-blog/2008/06/rhetoric-of-debates-discussions-and-arguments-useful-destructive-criticism-for-scientific-academic-research-reasons-and-personal-opinions-applied-to-indo-european-language-revival/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 06:25:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Indo-European</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conlang]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dnghu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Esperanto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europaio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indo-European]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indo-European language]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Auxiliary Languages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Language alternatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Proto-Indo-European]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[academic research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[argument]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[basque]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chomsky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cicero]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cornish]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[creationism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[discussion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[esperanto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[estonian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[finnish]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gimbutas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hebrew]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hungarian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[israeli]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[katharevousa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kkk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[language]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[language revival]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[latin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lojban]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maltese]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[migrations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[minority language]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nazi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[non-indo-european]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[orator]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[personal opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[proto-celtic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[proto-germanic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[proto-language]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[proto-slavic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[racism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ratio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reasons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regional language]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[renfrew]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rhetoric]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scientific research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[skinner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sophism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ukrainian]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carlosquiles.com/indo-european-language-blog/?p=52</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rhetoric (Wikipedia) is the art of harnessing reason, emotions and authority, through language, with a view to persuade an audience and, by persuading, to convince this audience to act, to pass judgement or to identify with given values. The word derives from PIE root wer-, &#8216;speak&#8217;, as in MIE zero-grade wrdhom, &#8216;word&#8217;, or full-grade werdhom, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://carlosquiles.com/indo-european-language-blog/2008/06/rhetoric-of-debates-discussions-and-arguments-useful-destructive-criticism-for-scientific-academic-research-reasons-and-personal-opinions-applied-to-indo-european-language-revival/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Esperanto &amp; other invented languages vs. Indo-European for Europe (and IV): Universal Law of Persistence of Error</title>
		<link>http://carlosquiles.com/indo-european-language-blog/2008/05/esperanto-other-invented-languages-vs-indo-european-and-iv-persistence-of-error/</link>
		<comments>http://carlosquiles.com/indo-european-language-blog/2008/05/esperanto-other-invented-languages-vs-indo-european-and-iv-persistence-of-error/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 09:33:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Indo-European</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conlang]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dnghu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[English]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Esperanto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europaio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indo-European language]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Language alternatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Proto-Indo-European]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conlanging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[esperanto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hebrew]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hebrew language]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ido]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indo-European]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interlingua]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[language family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[language revival]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[modern hebrew]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[revival]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zamenhof]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carlosquiles.com/indo-european-language-blog/?p=51</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A recent comment on the post about the so-called Grin Report &#8211; which explained the benefits of having one common language for Europe -, gives (unintentionally, I guess) still more reasons to support a natural language like Proto-Indo-European over Esperanto and similar inventions: Le meilleur est l’ennemi du bien, &#8216;The best is the enemy of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://carlosquiles.com/indo-european-language-blog/2008/05/esperanto-other-invented-languages-vs-indo-european-and-iv-persistence-of-error/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Indo-European language revival in 2007 &#8211; Summary of our European Union&#8217;s language project</title>
		<link>http://carlosquiles.com/indo-european-language-blog/2008/01/indo-european-language-revival-in-2007-the-european-union-didnt-answer/</link>
		<comments>http://carlosquiles.com/indo-european-language-blog/2008/01/indo-european-language-revival-in-2007-the-european-union-didnt-answer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 19:17:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Indo-European</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Indo-European language]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indo-European]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[indoeuropean]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[language policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[language revival]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[linguistic diversity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Proto-Indo-European]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carlosquiles.com/indo-european-language-blog/2008/01/03/indo-european-language-revival-in-2007-the-european-union-didnt-answer/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After another year of Indo-European language revival we owe a little summary of what (I think) has happened during the last 12 months, and how our expectations have developed. The last year of 2007 has been great in terms of: - Collaboration : thanks to the dozens of contributions we have now an almost stable [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://carlosquiles.com/indo-european-language-blog/2008/01/indo-european-language-revival-in-2007-the-european-union-didnt-answer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Argumentation, debate, and dialectic in Science, applied to Linguistics</title>
		<link>http://carlosquiles.com/indo-european-language-blog/2007/08/argumentation-debate-and-dialectic-in-science-applied-to-linguistics/</link>
		<comments>http://carlosquiles.com/indo-european-language-blog/2007/08/argumentation-debate-and-dialectic-in-science-applied-to-linguistics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 07:39:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Indo-European</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Indo-European language]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Proto-Indo-European]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carlosquiles.com/indo-european-language-blog/2007/08/21/argumentation-debate-and-dialectic-in-science-applied-to-linguistics/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The title is somehow formal, but I couldn&#8217;t find a better one. I tried to talk with my uncle again about Indo-European: I don&#8217;t care about a thousand ignorants saying &#8220;PIE is an invention&#8221;, but it&#8217;s obvious I don&#8217;t like a learned Latin professor like him promoting this idea among his students&#8230; So, after introducing [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://carlosquiles.com/indo-european-language-blog/2007/08/argumentation-debate-and-dialectic-in-science-applied-to-linguistics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Doubtfully proven hypothesis: Holocaust vs. Revisionism, Creationism vs. Evolution, and Indo-European vs. Latin &amp; Greek?</title>
		<link>http://carlosquiles.com/indo-european-language-blog/2007/08/doubtfully-proven-hypothesis-holocaust-vs-revisionism-creationism-vs-evolution-and-indo-european-vs-latin-greek/</link>
		<comments>http://carlosquiles.com/indo-european-language-blog/2007/08/doubtfully-proven-hypothesis-holocaust-vs-revisionism-creationism-vs-evolution-and-indo-european-vs-latin-greek/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Aug 2007 17:22:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Indo-European</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indo-European language]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Proto-Indo-European]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carlosquiles.com/indo-european-language-blog/2007/08/19/doubtfully-proven-hypothesis-holocaust-vs-revisionism-creationism-vs-evolution-and-indo-european-vs-latin-greek/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[About the Proto-Indo-European language, one could say that a &#8220;proven hypothesis&#8221; is a fact. It&#8217;s not a certainty and it never will be until we invent time machines, but it&#8217;s a well-supported and widely accepted theory. With this kind of theory, it&#8217;s not a question of proven or unproven, because you can&#8217;t ever prove it. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://carlosquiles.com/indo-european-language-blog/2007/08/doubtfully-proven-hypothesis-holocaust-vs-revisionism-creationism-vs-evolution-and-indo-european-vs-latin-greek/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

