<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Indo-European languages &#38; Europe &#187; Indo-European languages</title>
	<atom:link href="http://carlosquiles.com/indo-european-language-blog/category/indo-european-languages/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://carlosquiles.com/indo-european-language-blog</link>
	<description>Proto-Indo-European Language, Indo-European Languages &#38; European Union Language Policy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 May 2011 15:48:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
<cloud domain='carlosquiles.com' port='80' path='/indo-european-language-blog/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />
		<item>
		<title>How &#8216;difficult&#8217; (using Esperantist terms) is an inflected language like Proto-Indo-European for Europeans?</title>
		<link>http://carlosquiles.com/indo-european-language-blog/2008/06/how-difficult-using-esperantist-terms-is-an-inflected-language-like-proto-indo-european-for-europeans/</link>
		<comments>http://carlosquiles.com/indo-european-language-blog/2008/06/how-difficult-using-esperantist-terms-is-an-inflected-language-like-proto-indo-european-for-europeans/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 09:50:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Indo-European</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conlang]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dnghu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[English]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Esperanto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europaio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indo-European languages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Auxiliary Languages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Language alternatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Proto-Indo-European]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arcaicam esperantom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[declension]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[difficulty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[english]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[esperantism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[esperantist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[esperanto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[european languages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[french]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[german]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indo-European]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inflection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nominal inflection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nordic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[noun declension]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[noun inflection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[polish]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[russian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spanish]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[syntax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[verb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[verbal inflection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[verbal system]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carlosquiles.com/indo-european-language-blog/?p=58</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For native speakers of most modern Romance languages (apart from some reminiscence of the neuter case), Nordic (Germanic) languages, English, Dutch, or Bulgarian, it is usually considered &#8220;difficult&#8221; to learn an inflected language like Latin, German or Russian: cases are a priori felt as too strange, too &#8220;archaic&#8221;, too &#8216;foreign&#8217; to the own system of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://carlosquiles.com/indo-european-language-blog/2008/06/how-difficult-using-esperantist-terms-is-an-inflected-language-like-proto-indo-european-for-europeans/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Swastika: A Stupid Taboo in European and American countries</title>
		<link>http://carlosquiles.com/indo-european-language-blog/2007/09/swastika-a-taboo-in-western-countries/</link>
		<comments>http://carlosquiles.com/indo-european-language-blog/2007/09/swastika-a-taboo-in-western-countries/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Sep 2007 08:33:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Indo-European</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indo-European languages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Proto-Indo-European]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aryan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aryan race]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fascism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nazi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[religious symbol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[swastika]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[swastika ban]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[symbol]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carlosquiles.com/indo-european-language-blog/2007/08/24/swastika-a-taboo-in-western-countries/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The swastika (Wikipedia)- from Sanskrit svástika स्वास्तिक &#8211; is an equilateral cross with its arms bent at right angles, in either right-facing (卐) or left-facing (卍) forms. The term is derived from Sanskrit svasti, meaning well-being. The Thai greeting sawasdee is from the same root and carries the same implication. It is a widely-used symbol [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://carlosquiles.com/indo-european-language-blog/2007/09/swastika-a-taboo-in-western-countries/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Om mani padme hum: an etymology of a mantra common to Hinduism and Buddhism</title>
		<link>http://carlosquiles.com/indo-european-language-blog/2007/08/om-mani-padme-hum-an-etymology-of-a-mantra-common-to-hinduism-and-buddhism/</link>
		<comments>http://carlosquiles.com/indo-european-language-blog/2007/08/om-mani-padme-hum-an-etymology-of-a-mantra-common-to-hinduism-and-buddhism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2007 11:03:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Indo-European</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Indo-European]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indo-European languages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Proto-Indo-European]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carlosquiles.com/indo-european-language-blog/2007/08/22/om-mani-padme-hum-an-etymology-of-a-mantra-common-to-hinduism-and-buddhism/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was watching the TV this morning and heard some oriental-looking people in a (apparently) Tibetan film saying a sentence I had heard already in other films about India and the Tibet: oṃ maṇi padme hūṃ (Devanagari ॐ मणि पद्मे हूँ), probably the most famous mantra in Buddhism, the six syllabled mantra of the bodhisattva [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://carlosquiles.com/indo-european-language-blog/2007/08/om-mani-padme-hum-an-etymology-of-a-mantra-common-to-hinduism-and-buddhism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tamil vs. Sanskrit, or Indian  &#8216;official classical languages&#8217;, and the first tongue in India (AKA. Indus Valley Civilization language)</title>
		<link>http://carlosquiles.com/indo-european-language-blog/2007/08/tamil-vs-sanskrit-or-indian-official-classical-languages-and-the-first-tongue-in-india-aka-indus-valley-civilization-language/</link>
		<comments>http://carlosquiles.com/indo-european-language-blog/2007/08/tamil-vs-sanskrit-or-indian-official-classical-languages-and-the-first-tongue-in-india-aka-indus-valley-civilization-language/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 16:00:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Indo-European</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indo-European languages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Proto-Indo-European]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carlosquiles.com/indo-european-language-blog/2007/08/17/tamil-vs-sanskrit-or-indian-official-classical-languages-and-the-first-tongue-in-india-aka-indus-valley-civilization-language/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have read and heard many stupidities regarding linguistic status and language differences: - Brazilian is a different language (i.e. not Portuguese), because Galician is a language also (yes, Galician is interestingly enough a &#8216;language&#8217; which stops in the administrative division between Spain and Portugal &#8211; more or less like Valencian and Catalan). - French [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://carlosquiles.com/indo-european-language-blog/2007/08/tamil-vs-sanskrit-or-indian-official-classical-languages-and-the-first-tongue-in-india-aka-indus-valley-civilization-language/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>28</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

